Patent eligibility in Australia: the winding road ahead
In the highly anticipated decision in D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics, handed down earlier this month, the High Court of Australia has unanimously held that isolated naturally occurring DNA is not eligible for patent protection. This decision overturned two earlier Federal Court decisions (Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics 2013 and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics 2014) which had unanimously upheld the patent eligibility of isolated DNA, specifically the isolated BRCA DNA which was the subject of Myriad’s Australian patent number 686004.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
3 July 2026 A report warns that procurement reforms in Mainland China, alongside the rise of open robotics platforms, supply chain disruption and GLP-1 drugs, are challenging existing medtech business models.
22 June 2026 The court granted Blue Cross Laboratories a permanent injunction after finding that a rival product’s mark and packaging closely mirrored its own.
27 May 2026 China’s IP system is undergoing real change. Takeda’s IP head for the region explains what that looks like on the ground and why the old playbook no longer cuts it.