shutterstock_2131359385_sruilk
9 November 2023BiotechnologyMarisa Woutersen

Taiwan company fails to overturn PTAB decision over eye treatment patent

Federal Circuit rejects appeal in patent dispute with California’s Cloudbreak Theraputics | Court stated failure to prove concrete injury.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has dismissed an appeal brought by Allgenesis Biotherapeutics against Cloudbreak Therapeutics in a precedential decision.

The case involved a dispute over a patent related to an eye drug treatment.

Allgenesis contested a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) final written decision in February 2022, which concluded that Allgenesis had failed to prove the unpatentability of one of Cloudbreak’s patents.

Cloudbreak’s patent, US patent number 10,149,82, is a method for treating pterygium, an eye condition characterised by tumour-like growth extending from the nasal or side of the eye to the cornea.

The patent proposes a treatment involving the administration of multikinase inhibitors to inhibit specific growth factors associated with tumour growth and eye redness.

Delivering the decision, Chief Judge Kimberly Moore said that Allgenesis had “failed to establish an injury in fact sufficient to confer standing to appeal.”

Allgenesis’ failed arguments

The court highlighted two main arguments put forward by Allgenesis.

Firstly, Allgenesis argued that it faced an injury based on potential infringement liability arising from its development of nintedanib treatments for pterygium.

The court found Allgenesis' assertions vague and lacking specificity, stating the company failed to provide concrete plans for future activities creating a substantial risk of infringement.

Moreover, Allgenesis also claimed injury based on the PTAB's priority determination, asserting that it would impact the scope of its patent rights.

The court rejected this argument, emphasising that Allgenesis did not express specifically how the Board's decision would impact its issued patents or pending applications.

The court stated that Allgenesis had failed to establish a concrete injury, and as a result, dismissed the appeal on November 7.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
22 March 2018   Novartis has accused competitor Regeneron of patent infringement through the latter’s sale of Eylea and Zaltrap.
Big Pharma
10 May 2019   Novartis is set to acquire assets associated with Xiidra ((lifitegrast ophthalmic solution), a dry eye treatment, from Takeda.

More on this story

Americas
22 March 2018   Novartis has accused competitor Regeneron of patent infringement through the latter’s sale of Eylea and Zaltrap.
Big Pharma
10 May 2019   Novartis is set to acquire assets associated with Xiidra ((lifitegrast ophthalmic solution), a dry eye treatment, from Takeda.

More on this story

Americas
22 March 2018   Novartis has accused competitor Regeneron of patent infringement through the latter’s sale of Eylea and Zaltrap.
Big Pharma
10 May 2019   Novartis is set to acquire assets associated with Xiidra ((lifitegrast ophthalmic solution), a dry eye treatment, from Takeda.