24 March 2016PharmaJoachim Wachenfeld and Oswin Ridderbusch
A second bite at the cherry
Second medical use claims have a long-standing history in European Patent Office (EPO) case law. As is well known, the first ever decision of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal confirmed the patentability of second medical use claims when written in the so-called Swiss-type format. The Enlarged Board in that 1984 decision, G5/83, held that protection was available for “specified new and inventive therapeutic application[s]”. In the years that followed the technical boards of appeal controversially discussed what exactly was meant by the “specified therapeutic applications” referred to by the Enlarged Board.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
25 September 2026 Another Wegovy patent has been drawn into the long-running dispute between Mylan and Novo Nordisk over proposed generic versions of the weight-loss drug.
24 September 2026 An Entresto Orange Book listing has survived a challenge in the US, while two trademark disputes handed Novartis contrasting fortunes at a European court.
22 September 2026 After a run of UK decisions going against major pharma patents on plausibility, Novartis bucked the trend with Entresto. The company’s lead counsel from Bristows explains why and what patentees can take from the ruling.