petr-kratochvila-shutterstock-com-australia-kangaroo-
Petr Kratochvila / Shutterstock.com
16 August 2016Asia-PacificGrant Shoebridge

A state of flux: life sciences law in Australia

In the last five years, patents directed to biologically derived inventions have been successfully challenged in the US and Australia on the basis of lack of patentable subject matter. In 2013 and 2015, the highest judicial authorities in the US and Australia respectively ruled against the patentability of isolated human genes that were claimed in a patent owned by Myriad Genetics and useful for determining susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Asia-Pacific
23 February 2023   New recruit joins from DLA Piper and will head up firm’s litigation team | Previously worked on Pfizer v Samsung Bioepis, Jusand v Rattlejack & Murray Engineering, and Pfizer v Sandoz | Follows prosecutor Chris Vindurampulle who joined in October last year.
Asia-Pacific
24 May 2022   The Federal Court of Australia has refused an appeal request in a decade-long case brought by Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health against MSD subsidiary, Intervet International.
Asia-Pacific
30 November 2020   The Federal Court of Australia has granted Pfizer subsidiary Wyeth’s bid for an injunction against Merck Sharp Dohme in a dispute over vaccine patents.