puhhha / iStockphoto.com
With the US Supreme Court set to decide the biosimilars dispute between Amgen and Sandoz, LSIPR examines the possible outcomes and implications for those in the industry.
There is a sense of tension and anxiety in the US biotech industry.
In April, the US Supreme Court held an oral hearing with Amgen and Sandoz. The two parties have fought a long battle over the interpretation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA).
The Supreme Court, which is set to make its decision in June, heard oral arguments on two questions. The first was whether a biosimilar applicant’s 180 days’ notice of commercial marketing is properly given only after its biosimilar product has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
You need a subscription to continue reading this content.
Start a subscription today to access the LSIPR website.
To access the full archive, digital magazines and special reports you will need to take out a paid subscription.
News stories up to a week old and feature articles on the day of publication are accessible with a BASIC FREE ACCOUNT.
Register here for free content, or subscribe for access to archive.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
For access to the complete website, archive, and to receive print publications, choose '12 MONTH SUBSCRIPTION'. For a free, two-week trial with full access, select ‘TWO WEEK FREE TRIAL’; and for basic access to the latest news on the website and weekly email news alerts choose the 'BASIC FREE ACCOUNT' registration.
biosimilar, Amgen and Sandoz, US Supreme Court, , OMalley, aBLA, BPCIA, applicants, sponsors, biosimilars
- Regents of the University of Michigan file patent suit against microscope maker
- EPO successful in cutting opposition times: Mewburn Ellis
- Roche buys fibrotic diseases biotech in $1.4bn deal
- Russian government approves compulsory drug licensing bill
- UKIPO dismisses Swiss IP office’s bid to stop Indian pharma TM