puhhha / iStockphoto.com
With the US Supreme Court set to decide the biosimilars dispute between Amgen and Sandoz, LSIPR examines the possible outcomes and implications for those in the industry.
There is a sense of tension and anxiety in the US biotech industry.
In April, the US Supreme Court held an oral hearing with Amgen and Sandoz. The two parties have fought a long battle over the interpretation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA).
The Supreme Court, which is set to make its decision in June, heard oral arguments on two questions. The first was whether a biosimilar applicant’s 180 days’ notice of commercial marketing is properly given only after its biosimilar product has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
European Patent Office
George Washington Law School
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
World Intellectual Property Office
biosimilar, Amgen and Sandoz, US Supreme Court, , OMalley, aBLA, BPCIA, applicants, sponsors, biosimilars