patronestaff / Shutterstock.com
The complex rules around the filing of divisional applications relating to priority of patent claims are designed to maintain the integrity of the first-to-file system, as Ashley Roughton of Nabarro explains.
A patent application can in effect destroy itself. It works like this: a priority filing might claim a kinase which has an acceptable homology with a particular sequence listing—call that kinase-SL. The filing which is eventually made claims the kinase as originally claimed and a more general description of it, such as any kinase which has general binding characteristics for a class of proteins, of which kinase-SL is a member—call that the class of kinases.
During the prosecution of the eventual filing a divisional application is made which makes a claim to kinase-SL and also to the class of kinases. Once granted the patent claims only the class of kinases. What is the status of the divisional application? The answer is that it can destroy the patent from which it was originally divided.
How does this work? The priority filing allows priority to be derived only as far as kinase-SL is concerned. As kinase-SL is not claimed in the eventual application, the granted patent is not entitled to priority and therefore its relevant date is its actual filing date. However, the divisional is entitled to priority in relation to kinase-SL. At this point one should recognise that the patent, despite claiming a generalised form of kinase, can be revoked for lack of novelty owing to the anticipation by a prior published specific example. In other words, if kinase-SL is published earlier then it can destroy the novelty of an invention claiming the class of kinases.
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
European Patent Office
George Washington Law School
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
World Intellectual Property Office
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription we can add you into for FREE, please contact Atif at firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
Ashley Roughton, Nabarro, patent, patent application, filing, EPC, EBoA, The Paris Convention, first-to-file,