Insurance  companies v AstraZeneca

“Pay for delay” agreements have been a hot topic on both sides of the Atlantic for some time. These are patent dispute settlements in which a generic manufacturer acknowledges the patent of the originator pharmaceutical company and agrees not to market its generic for a specific period of time. In return, the patent holder makes a payment to the generic company.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Americas

Hikma v Amarin: Six takeaways from the pivotal ruling

9 June 2026 A unanimous SCOTUS ruling is being hailed as a major win for Hikma, and for delivering some welcome clarity. Experts tell Marisa Woutersen how its implications could affect pharma patent strategy across the sector.

Americas

Fed Circ rejects Nexus’ appeal in generics row with biopharma firm

8 June 2026 Nexus Pharmaceuticals is knocked back by the US Court of Appeals, which upholds a district court finding that it infringed a rival’s patents.

Americas

Hikma triumphs at SCOTUS in landmark skinny-label ruling

4 June 2026 Justices refuse to place generic drug makers “between a rock and a hard place,” in a landmark ruling clarifying induced patent infringement in pharma.