nuvolanevicata / Shutterstock.com
Orphan medicinal products in Europe benefit from a range of incentives, but the greatest of these is the promise of receiving a ten-year period of true market exclusivity, says Trevor Cook of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.
Since 2001, the EU has had under Regulation No. 141/2000 a modified regulatory regime that provides incentives to develop orphan medicinal products—those that treat rare diseases with patient populations of generally less than 250,000—within the EU.
The regime has been a success, with the number of marketing authorisations (MAs) for orphan medicinal products increasing at a faster rate than new MAs generally. It has attracted little controversy, and litigation has usually focused on whether medicinal products meet the eligibility criteria to be designated as an orphan medicinal product, as in cases CSL Behring v European Commission (T-264/07) and Now Pharma v European Commission (T-74/08).
One of the regime’s incentives is a special market exclusivity system, which has now become the subject of litigation. The first decision on this, given by the EU General Court in a case brought by Teva, has confirmed its strength.
You need a subscription to continue reading this content.
To access the full archive, digital magazines and special reports you will need to take out a paid subscription.
News stories up to a week old and feature articles on the day of publication are accessible with a BASIC FREE ACCOUNT.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
For access to the complete website, archive, and to receive print publications, choose '12 MONTH SUBSCRIPTION'. For a free, two-week trial with full access, select ‘TWO WEEK FREE TRIAL’; and for basic access to the latest news on the website and weekly email news alerts choose the 'BASIC FREE ACCOUNT' registration.
market exclusivity, Novartis, CML, EMA, Teva, Gilvec,