Ethical considerations plus the ambiguity of the Biotech Directive are factors influencing the patentability of totipotent stem cells, says Andrew Sanderson.
It has for some years been possible to create pluripotent stem cells (stem cells capable of differentiating into many, but not all, other cell types of the body) from fully differentiated adult cells (so called ‘induced pluripotent stem cells’ [iPS cells]).
Recent advances by the tumour suppression group of Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO) in Spain have resulted in the production of iPS cells with totipotency features, raising the hope that induced totipotent stem cell (iTS cell) technology could become a practical reality. Previous to this discovery, the only practical source of totipotent stem cells (stem cells capable of differentiating into any other cell type of the body) was embryonic tissue.
The possibility of producing iTS cells from adult cells could abolish the current need to use embryos to obtain totipotent cells, thereby removing many ethical concerns associated with this field of research, and perhaps allow the engineering of recipient-derived tissues that are insusceptible to transplant rejection. Hence, it is important to be able to secure patent protection for iTS cell technologies in order to attract the investment necessary to develop them into mature, practical tools.
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
Cooley
European Patent Office
Finnegan LLP
GH Research
Gowling WLG
George Washington Law School
HGF Limited
IQVIA
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
Mintz Levin
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
Taylor Wessing
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Valea AB
World Intellectual Property Office
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription we can add you into for FREE, please contact Atif at achoudhury@newtonmedia.co.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
Stem cells, Totipotent stem cells, patentability, Biotech Directive
