CJEU puts further brakes on SPCs
Brian A Jackson / Shutterstock.com
The CJEU’s decision in Royalty Pharma has provided much-anticipated guidance on supplementary protection certificates but has left a lot of uncertainty. Was this the best the CJEU could come up with? Beatriz San Martin of Arnold & Porter reports.
At the end of April the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its judgment in Case C-650/17 Royalty Pharma Collection Trust.
The decision relates to yet another preliminary reference to the CJEU on the interpretation of article 3(a) of the Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) Regulation and is the second time the CJEU has been given the opportunity to clarify what the test should be for functional claims.
While the decision includes some welcome clarity, it is also mixed with several new elements of ambiguity which no doubt will keep attorneys, patent offices and courts scratching their heads for some time to come.
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
European Patent Office
George Washington Law School
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
World Intellectual Property Office
CJEU, Court of Justice of the European Union, SPC, supplementary protection certificates, Royalty Pharma, Beatriz San Martin, Arnold & Porter