Two pharmaceutical cases highlight recent developments in Canadian patent law relating to duty of candour during patent prosecution and patent claim construction, says Katie Wang.
Duty of candour
A recent case from the Federal Court in Canada has highlighted the importance of duty of candour during prosecution and closely scrutinising the file wrapper in assessing patent validity.
The duty of candour is a well-established doctrine in the United States. It requires every party to a patent application, including a patent applicant and its agents, to disclose to the United States Patent and Trademarks Office all publications that they know of that may adversely affect the patentability of their invention.
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
European Patent Office
George Washington Law School
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
World Intellectual Property Office
Canada, patent law, pharmaceuticals, duty of candour, Wenk