A German Federal Court decision has given patent applicants in the life sciences field plenty to think about, as Wolfgang Bublak and Axel Berger explain.
Last year, the German Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) rendered its much noted decision in the UV-unempfindliche Druckplatte (UV-insensitive printing plate; docket number X ZR 3/10) case, that highlights the requirements for claiming priority.
According to German practice, two requirements have to be fulfilled in order to claim priority from an earlier application by filing “the same invention” as stipulated, eg, in Article 40(1) of the German Patent Act or in Article 87(1) of the European Patent Convention (EPC): (i) the invention including all of its features needs to be disclosed “directly and unambiguously” in the earlier application; and (ii) all features need to be disclosed “as belonging to the invention”, ie, as possible embodiments of the invention.
You need a subscription to continue reading this content.
To access the full archive, digital magazines and special reports you will need to take out a paid subscription.
News stories up to a week old and feature articles on the day of publication are accessible with a BASIC FREE ACCOUNT.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
For access to the complete website, archive, and to receive print publications, choose '12 MONTH SUBSCRIPTION'. For a free, two-week trial with full access, select ‘TWO WEEK FREE TRIAL’; and for basic access to the latest news on the website and weekly email news alerts choose the 'BASIC FREE ACCOUNT' registration.
Priority, disclosure, German Federal Court, UV-unempfindliche Druckplatte, novelty