pros-and-cons
docstockmedia / shutterstock.com
1 September 2016Big PharmaClare Greatbanks

The pros and cons of second medical use

With any generic product launch, the generic company must decide whether to ‘clear the path’ by applying to invalidate the patent covering the pharmaceutical product before launch, or launch at risk without clearing the path, where the key risk is that the patent owner seeks a preliminary injunction. The pregabalin litigation, heard by the English Court of Appeal in Warner-Lambert v Actavis in May 2016, demonstrates the additional considerations for a second medical use patent.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Big Pharma
27 November 2025   Clinical trials create a patent paradox. With EPO case law rapidly reshaping the 'expectation of success' test—most recently T136/24—the line between innovation and obviousness is blurred. Amanda Simons of J A Kemp offers drafting strategies to secure protection for your downstream innovations.
Big Pharma
20 November 2025   A new report from Clarivate highlights a jump in the tech’s adoption among IP professionals over the past two years, as well as concerns over governance.
Big Pharma
10 November 2025   According to new research, generic and brand-name pharma companies are ramping up ANDA litigation with Sun Pharma and Bristol Myers Squibb leading the charge.