The exclusion from patentability of certain cells derived from human embryos is a reflection of the EPO’s increasingly restrictive stance, say Franz-Josef Zimmer and Markus Grammel.
Two decisions handed down by a Technical Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO)—T 1836/10 in April 2013 and T 2221/10 in February 2014—seem to cement the restrictive approach that has taken hold at the EPO with regard to the patenting of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs).
Patenting of hESCs in Europe is largely governed by Article 6(2)(c) of Directive 98/44/EC, the ‘Biotech Directive’, which has been transposed into national law by the EU member states, and Rule 28(c) of the European Patent Convention (EPC), for EPC member states, both of which exclude the use of human embryos for industrial or commercial purposes from patentability.
In the landmark decision G 2/06 (WARF) the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO (EBoA) had to interpret Rule 28(c). The EBoA pointed out that when considering exclusion from patentability under Rule 28(c) one must examine not only the wording of the claims but also the technical teaching of the application as a whole. Applying this interpretation, the EBoA held that any claims directed to products which at the filing date could be prepared exclusively by a method which necessarily involved the destruction of human embryos were excluded from patentability under Rule 28(c). This held even if this method was not part of the claims.
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
European Patent Office
George Washington Law School
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
World Intellectual Property Office
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription we can add you into for FREE, please contact Atif at firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
stem cells, patents, EPO, Biotech Directive