Subscribe
shutterstock_1459877912_oleksandrshnuryk
OleksandrShnuryk / Shutterstock.com
7 June 2021Big PharmaMuireann Bolger

Endo, Impax face class-action over antitrust claims

Endo International and Amneal Pharmaceuticals’ subsidiary, Impax Laboratories, have failed to prevent antitrust claims over a patent settlement from going to trial.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
Generic maker pays $145m to settle antitrust suit
21 July 2022   California company resolves pay-for-delay issue over opioids | Allegations were brought by direct purchasers eight years ago.
Americas
Endo pays $2.3m to settle states antitrust claims
22 July 2019   Ireland-headquartered Endo Pharmaceuticals agreed to pay $2.3 million to 18 states late last week, settling allegations that the drugmaker paid a competitor to keep a generic version of pain relief drug Lidoderm off the market.
Americas
Endo resolves FTC allegations over Lidoderm and Opana ER
24 January 2017   Endo Pharmaceuticals yesterday settled charges brought by the Federal Trade Commission by abandoning anti-competitive pay-for-delay agreements.


Editor's picks

‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
Europe
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
3 July 2025

Editor's picks

Europe
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
3 July 2025
Americas
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
24 June 2025
Europe
Diverging in the detail: UPC local divisions and Court of Appeal take different paths
19 June 2025
Europe
UPC confirms permanent injunction against Curio in 10x tech dispute
17 June 2025
Americas
LSPN: In-house ‘chess game’ is the same, but the rules have changed
9 May 2025
Americas
Life sciences leaders recognised at LSPN Awards USA 2025
8 May 2025

More on this story

Americas
Generic maker pays $145m to settle antitrust suit
21 July 2022   California company resolves pay-for-delay issue over opioids | Allegations were brought by direct purchasers eight years ago.
Americas
Endo pays $2.3m to settle states antitrust claims
22 July 2019   Ireland-headquartered Endo Pharmaceuticals agreed to pay $2.3 million to 18 states late last week, settling allegations that the drugmaker paid a competitor to keep a generic version of pain relief drug Lidoderm off the market.
Americas
Endo resolves FTC allegations over Lidoderm and Opana ER
24 January 2017   Endo Pharmaceuticals yesterday settled charges brought by the Federal Trade Commission by abandoning anti-competitive pay-for-delay agreements.

More on this story

Americas
Generic maker pays $145m to settle antitrust suit
21 July 2022   California company resolves pay-for-delay issue over opioids | Allegations were brought by direct purchasers eight years ago.
Americas
Endo pays $2.3m to settle states antitrust claims
22 July 2019   Ireland-headquartered Endo Pharmaceuticals agreed to pay $2.3 million to 18 states late last week, settling allegations that the drugmaker paid a competitor to keep a generic version of pain relief drug Lidoderm off the market.
Americas
Endo resolves FTC allegations over Lidoderm and Opana ER
24 January 2017   Endo Pharmaceuticals yesterday settled charges brought by the Federal Trade Commission by abandoning anti-competitive pay-for-delay agreements.

More features

‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
BMS unit loses cell therapy patent at European Patent Office
Amgen sues Biocon over blockbuster bone drugs as first biosimilars enter market
Lord Justice Birss to become chancellor of the High Court
Bankruptcy judge approves $305m sale of genetics testing company
Sanofi successfully challenges rare disease patent in Europe
Bayer appoints new head of IP
WATCH: Policy direction—where are we now?