Goran Bogicevic / Shutterstock.com
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has rejected a man’s claim that he was stopped from entering the fitness machine market because he feared infringing patents that were eventually found to be falsely attributed to Nautilus.
To continue reading this article and to access our full archive, digital magazines and special reports you will need a subscription.
If you have already subscribed please login.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription we can add you into, please email Atif at email@example.com
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
For access to the complete website and archive choose '12 MONTH SUBSCRIPTION'. For a free, two-week trial select ‘TWO WEEK FREE TRIAL’.
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Ponani Sukumar; Southern California Stroke Rehabilitation Associates; AIA; competitive injury; false marking