Supermarket chain settles pay-for-delay suit over birth control pill
19-12-2019
FTC demands corrections in GSK, Teva pay-for-delay ruling
17-03-2016
Sebastian Duda / Shutterstock.com
The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has revived claims that pay-for-delay settlements involving pharmaceutical company Warner Chilcott may be in breach of competition law, despite the deals not including cash payments.
You need a subscription to continue reading this content.
Start a subscription today to access the LSIPR website.
To access the full archive, digital magazines and special reports you will need to take out a paid subscription.
News stories up to a week old and feature articles on the day of publication are accessible with a BASIC FREE ACCOUNT.
Register here for free content, or subscribe for access to archive.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
For access to the complete website, archive, and to receive print publications, choose '12 MONTH SUBSCRIPTION'. For a free, two-week trial with full access, select ‘TWO WEEK FREE TRIAL’; and for basic access to the latest news on the website and weekly email news alerts choose the 'BASIC FREE ACCOUNT' registration.
US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit; Warner Chilcott; US Supreme Court; FTC v Actavis; Watson; Lupin; anti-competition; Loestrin 24
