German court deals blow to Sanofi over cholesterol drug
05-06-2019
Keitma / Shutterstock.com
A German court has found that Sanofi’s high-cholesterol treatment, Praluent, infringes one of Amgen’s patents.
In a judgment yesterday, July 11, the Düsseldorf Regional Court said the treatment infringes the EU patent 2, 215,124 and granted Amgen an injunction prohibiting the manufacture, sale and marketing of the drug in Germany.
In 2016, Amgen, which sells a rival drug named Repatha, sued Sanofi in Germany claiming that Praluent infringes its patent on Repatha.
Both Praluent and Repatha are used in the treatment of persistently high cholesterol levels in the blood.
Sanofi then sought to acquire a licence from Amgen and both companies engaged in licensing negotiations, but an agreement was not reached.
In response, Sanofi petitioned the German Patent Court to grant it a compulsory licence for the distribution of Praluent, but this was dismissed.
Then, last month Sanofi sought to have the case dismissed by the country’s Federal Court of Justice, but its bid was rejected, as reported by LSIPR.
In a statement, Sanofi said it was disappointed with the latest decision.
“We continue to believe that patients and physicians should have a choice of cholesterol-lowering therapies in order to achieve optimal lipid-lowering for patients,” it said.
“This decision by the Düsseldorf Regional Court is relevant only to Germany and is not binding on other national courts in Europe. The decision has absolutely no connection with the efficacy, quality or safety of Praluent, which were never called into question in this litigation,” it added.
Sanofi said that at this time, Praluent remains on the market in Germany. For the injunction to go into effect, Amgen must enforce it by posting a bond.
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
Cooley
European Patent Office
Finnegan LLP
GH Research
Gowling WLG
George Washington Law School
HGF Limited
IQVIA
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
Mintz Levin
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
Taylor Wessing
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Valea AB
World Intellectual Property Office
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription we can add you into for FREE, please contact Atif at achoudhury@newtonmedia.co.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
Sanofi, Praluent, Düsseldorf Regional Court, Federal Court of Justice, Repatha, Praluent, patent infringement, licencing, injunction