shutterstock_1933953794_postmodern_studio
Postmodern Studio / Shutterstock.com
11 April 2022Big PharmaAlex Baldwin

PTAB grants review of Seagen patent on eve of court’s infringement ruling

The US Patent Trial and Appeal Board has agreed to review claims of a Seagen patent that Daiichi Sankyo was found to have infringed with its Enhertu (trastuzumab deruxtecan) breast cancer treatment.

Daiichi and AstraZeneca had previously asked the board to review the patent claims and were rejected. But on the eve of a decision from a Texas court ordering Daiichi to pay $41.8 million for infringing the patent, the board decided to grant the review.

The PTAB said evidence submitted by Daiichi and its marketing partner AstraZeneca is more likely than not to prove at least one claim of Seagen’s US Patent 10,808,039 is unpatentable.

The ‘039 patent covers technology used to administer chemotherapy drugs directly to cancerous cells.

The PTAB initially denied the petition to review the patent on Fintiv grounds due to possible scheduling conflicts with the parallel district court proceedings.

Daiichi and AstraZeneca filed two separate petitions requesting that the board grant a review of different claims in the ‘039 patent. In both petitions, Daiichi and AstraZeneca claimed that prior art referred to as Ogitani anticipates at least one of the ‘039 patent claims.

In decisions handed down on Thursday, April 7, the board granted a post-grant review of all the contested claims in both petitions.

Parallel litigation

Seagen initially sued Daiichi in October 2020, claiming that Daiichi’s Enhertu infringed the ‘039 antibody patent which it had spent “hundreds of millions of dollars” investing in developing.

Daiichi and AstraZeneca, which later intervened in the lawsuit, held that the patent was invalid at district court proceedings but judge Rodney Gilstrap refused to invalidate the patent.

A five-day trial began at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on April 4.

The judgment was handed down on Friday, April 8, ordering Daiichi to pay $41.8 million for directly infringing the ‘039 patent.

Gilstrap also sanctioned Daiichi to the tune of $75,000 for “discovery misconduct” for failing to produce certain documents in discovery.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.


More on this story

Americas
22 October 2020   US biotechnology company Seagen has accused Japanese pharmaceutical company Daiichi Sankyo of infringing patents with a recently-approved breast cancer drug.
Americas
18 November 2020   Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca have asked the US District Court for the District of Delaware for a declaration that their breast cancer treatment does not infringe a chemotherapy patent owned by biotechnology company Seagen.
Americas
16 August 2022   Dispute over the Enhertu began in 2019 | Antibody drug conjugate tech at issue | American Arbitration Association issued final decision.

More on this story

Americas
22 October 2020   US biotechnology company Seagen has accused Japanese pharmaceutical company Daiichi Sankyo of infringing patents with a recently-approved breast cancer drug.
Americas
18 November 2020   Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca have asked the US District Court for the District of Delaware for a declaration that their breast cancer treatment does not infringe a chemotherapy patent owned by biotechnology company Seagen.
Americas
16 August 2022   Dispute over the Enhertu began in 2019 | Antibody drug conjugate tech at issue | American Arbitration Association issued final decision.