Sequenom and Illumina prevail in UK confidentiality dispute
The England and Wales High Court has ruled in favour of Sequenom and Illumina, after the companies asked the court to rule that they were entitled to receive confidential information in legal proceedings against three competitors without additional restriction.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
19 February 2026 An EPO appeals board has denied Boston Scientific’s bid to revoke St Jude Medical’s transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patent, but declined to hand a complete victory to the patent owner.
19 February 2026 The genetic testing firm claims that a former oncology specialist stole hundreds of confidential files in the dead of night, days before moving to a competitor.
13 February 2026 This year’s featured firms and individuals ranked by sister title WIPR, include those instructed on the biggest tech and life sciences cases, as well as the strategists devising global AI patent portfolios.
