frankie-s-shutterstock-com-balance-
frankie's / Shutterstock.com
18 August 2016AmericasPat Carson and Mira Atanassova Mulvaney

Biomedical patents: the quest for balance

The trend of frequent challenges to patent eligibility started with the US Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski v Kappos in 2010. Noting that “business method patents were rarely issued until modern times”, that “some business method patents raise special problems in terms of vagueness and suspect validity”, and that “[i]f a high enough bar is not set when considering [business method patents], patent examiners and courts could be flooded with claims that would put a chill on creative endeavour and dynamic change”, the court in Bilski endeavoured to set the “high enough bar” that it deemed necessary to preserve the stated purpose of the Patent Act in the business method context.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
27 February 2026   The companies have agreed to dismiss their long-running patent fight over tumour-informed liquid biopsy technology, closing a high-stakes chapter in the fast-growing MRD testing market—while leaving the door open to future claims.
Americas
26 February 2026   As the US Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the Hikma and Amarin dispute, the case has drawn a broad coalition of industry support—including the US government and a co-author of the Hatch-Waxman Act itself.
Americas
26 February 2026   In a decision with implications for biotechnology licensing and pharmaceutical manufacturing, the Ninth Circuit has rejected a ‘sweeping’ royalty trigger from a lower court.