In a long series of judgments and orders, starting with the Medeva case, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has given guidance on the exact requirements for the grant of supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for medicinal products in the EU. It seems that the matter is finally settling after last December’s judgments in the Actavis, Georgetown II and Eli Lilly cases, in a manner that appears generally acceptable, but that may not be the case when it comes to biologicals.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
16 July 2026 A Munich court ruled that Illumina infringed a rival’s DNA sequencing patents, handing the challenger an early victory in a dispute that is playing out across Europe and the US.
15 July 2026 French drugmaker's Translate Bio unit accuses COVID rivals of infringing core lipid nanoparticle and mRNA purification patents, seeking damages from vaccines worth billions.
10 July 2026 Harbour’s trial counsel shares the strategy behind the company’s $20m win, revealing how a highly technical patent dispute became a case about credibility as much as science.