pill-in-hand
19 February 2014AsiaJitesh Kumar

The Glivec case: getting beyond efficacy

The judgment of the Indian Supreme Court concerning Novartis’ anti-cancer drug Glivec has dominated all recent discussions on Section 3(d) of the Indian Patents Act. Despite being a landmark reference for issues pertaining to Section 3(d), it is often forgotten that there is much more to Section 3(d) beyond the “enhanced efficacy” requirement, which the judgment did not address.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Asia
5 February 2026   The British-Swedish pharma giant pays $1.2 billion upfront for access to next-generation weight-loss treatment as China patent cliff changes the market.
Asia
20 January 2026   Magic Circle and major US firm among dealmakers who worked on the licensing agreement for a bispecific antibody candidate, marking another significant outbound licensing deal from China’s biopharma sector.
Asia
6 January 2026   Danish pharma giant notches an important victory in a huge market for semaglutide, but faces a patent cliff and mounting challenges across India, Canada and the US.