lsipr-oct-13-page-40
16 October 2013PharmaBethan Hopewell and Geraldine Quinn

'Because he fears': should generics fear the high court's quia timet injunctions?

In July 2013, the English High Court gave its judgment in an action brought by patentee Merck Sharp & Dohme, and its exclusive licensee Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), against generic pharmaceutical manufacturer Teva.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Pharma
1 October 2026   The decision leaves a $177 million verdict against Lilly intact, but a dissenting judge has warned the ruling could “undermine medical innovation” by allowing overly broad patent claims to survive and provide a way around the Supreme Court’s Amgen decision.
Pharma
28 September 2026   Can a drug’s ‘inactive’ precursor qualify for a multi-million pound patent extension? The UK High Court has just delivered a ruling on Takeda's ADHD drug Elvanse, weighing regulatory precedent against a conflicting German decision.
Pharma
25 September 2026   Another Wegovy patent has been drawn into the long-running dispute between Mylan and Novo Nordisk over proposed generic versions of the weight-loss drug.