Subscribe
shutterstock-137808212-web
Photo: ollyy / Shutterstock.com
29 January 2014Americas

Non-profit celebrates ear implant win

A US medical research foundation has received about $131.2 million in damages after a jury  found that two of its patents covering cochlear implants were infringed.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
SurgiSil: Lip implant case shows looks can be deceiving
3 March 2022   A seemingly small decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit could have a big impact on owners of design patents, explains Elizabeth Ferrill of Finnegan.


Editor's picks

LSPN: In-house ‘chess game’ is the same, but the rules have changed
Americas
LSPN: In-house ‘chess game’ is the same, but the rules have changed
9 May 2025

Editor's picks

Americas
LSPN: In-house ‘chess game’ is the same, but the rules have changed
9 May 2025
Americas
LSPN: Counsel grapple with AI’s impact on training and critical thinking
8 May 2025
Americas
LSPN: Using ‘the patentee’s friend’ in Section 112 claims
6 May 2025
Americas
Why US patent reform is ‘essential’ for US economic prosperity and security
29 April 2025
Europe
Meril v Edwards: Harmonisation of obviousness at the UPC and the EPO
24 April 2025
Americas
WIPR Diversity & Inclusion reveals Top 100 People in IP for 2025
24 April 2025

More on this story

Americas
SurgiSil: Lip implant case shows looks can be deceiving
3 March 2022   A seemingly small decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit could have a big impact on owners of design patents, explains Elizabeth Ferrill of Finnegan.

More on this story

Americas
SurgiSil: Lip implant case shows looks can be deceiving
3 March 2022   A seemingly small decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit could have a big impact on owners of design patents, explains Elizabeth Ferrill of Finnegan.

More features

LSPN: In-house ‘chess game’ is the same, but the rules have changed
Life sciences leaders recognised at LSPN Awards USA 2025
UK-India trade deal is ‘a missed opportunity for UK pharma’, says industry body
LSPN: Counsel grapple with AI’s impact on training and critical thinking
'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system
LSPN: Trump's policy storm causing chaos and confusion
Taylor Wessing expands in Europe with Paris team
LSPN: Using ‘the patentee’s friend’ in Section 112 claims