16-02-2017
Firstsignal / iStockphoto.com
The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT’s patents concerning CRISPR technology do not interfere with patent claims filed by the University of California (UC), Berkeley and the University of Vienna.
Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review (LSIPR) tracks the increasing challenges for intellectual property specialists in the rapidly evolving world of life sciences. From gene patents to stem cell research, we provide the very best news and analysis.
To continue reading this article and to access 4,500+ articles, our digital magazines and special reports published for LSIPR subscribers only then you will need a subscription.
If you are already subscribed please login.
Official LSIPR subscribers include:
Allen & Overy
Arnold & Siedsma
Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch LLP (BSKB)
Carpmaels & Ransford
Cooley
European Patent Office
Finnegan LLP
GH Research
Gowling WLG
George Washington Law School
HGF Limited
IQVIA
Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
Marks & Clerk
Mintz Levin
NiKang Therapeutics Inc.
Powell Gilbert LLP
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
Taylor Wessing
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Valea AB
World Intellectual Property Office
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription we can add you into for FREE, please contact Atif at achoudhury@newtonmedia.co.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
PTAB, USPTO, CRISPR, Broad Institute, UC Berkeley, MIT, Harvard, Cas9, patent, genome editing
USPTO revives fight over CRISPR patents
27-06-2019
Federal Circuit sides with Broad Institute in CRISPR clash
11-09-2018
USPTO grants Charpentier-founded company first CRISPR patent
20-06-2018
Broad Institute takes three lines of attack in CRISPR appeal filing
26-10-2017
UC, Berkeley appeals to Federal Circuit in CRISPR patent clash
18-04-2017
