US court says ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash

29-06-2015

US court says ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash

Tetiana Yurchenko / Shutterstock.com

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash payments to be considered anticompetitive.


US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, pay-for-delay, GSK, Teva, antitrust

LSIPR