US court says ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash

The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ settlements do not need to involve cash payments to be considered anticompetitive.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Americas

Appeals court eases Teva’s headache with reversal

17 April 2026 A ruling that invalidated three of Teva's headache treatment patents has been thrown out, sending a long-running case back to the lower court.

Americas

Cancer drug researcher hit with suit over mutation-targeting tools

16 April 2026 The Cambridge biotech is accused of infringing six patents covering technologies used to target drug-resistant cancer mutations.

Americas

Court narrows Mylan’s Copaxone suit but key claims survive

14 April 2026 A US district court has allowed key elements of the generic drugmaker’s case against a rival to move forward, while drawing clear limits on how far the complaint can reach.