The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has long campaigned for pay-for-delay agreements to be presumed illegal by US courts. The blocking of a generic competitor from entering the market with a low-cost medicine through such deals has long drawn the ire of the regulatory body, which has argued that such deals are an unfair extension of a party’s patent rights.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
17 March 2026 Janssen seeks injunctive relief after a forensic review uncovers mass downloads of trade secrets spanning oncology, neuroscience and immunology portfolios.
12 March 2026 The event unpacked how technology, litigation trends, and global events are adding complexity while also offering benefits for legal teams under pressure to reduce costs.
12 March 2026 The pharma company has successfully enforced its patents against Ascent’s proposed mirabegron copy, shortly after inking licensing deals elsewhere over the medication.