pressmaster-shutterstock-com
Pressmaster / Shutterstock.com
19 August 2015Americas

CAFC must end ‘existential threat’ to patents, argues Sequenom

Sequenom has requested an en banc review of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision to invalidate one of its patents in its dispute with Ariosa Diagnostics, arguing that the decision creates an “existential threat” to patent protection.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
14 April 2026   A US district court has allowed key elements of the generic drugmaker’s case against a rival to move forward, while drawing clear limits on how far the complaint can reach.
Americas
10 April 2026   The 2026 panel has been chosen. With judges from Amgen, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Regeneron and law firms such as White & Case and Arnold & Porter, here’s who will be deciding this year’s winners.
Americas
7 April 2026   According to the settlement, MSN can maintain its challenge to several Bausch patents, while the details around potential product launch timings are unknown.