27 September 2013Americas

Judge denies AstraZeneca’s bid to squash pay-for-delay challenge

A federal judge has denied AstraZeneca’s motions to dismiss claims challenging its pay-for-delay deals with three generic pharmaceutical companies in connection to heartburn drug Nexium.

Already registered?

Login to your account

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

US Supreme Court backs ‘rule-of-reason’ for pay-for-delay

17 June 2013 A majority of the US Supreme Court has ruled that the US Federal Trade Commission should be able to challenge so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ patent litigation settlements on antitrust grounds.

AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy win ‘pay-for-delay’ case

8 December 2014 A US court has spared drug companies AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Laboratories a potentially hefty fine after ruling that a ‘pay-for-delay’ deal between them did not violate antitrust grounds.

More on this story

US Supreme Court backs ‘rule-of-reason’ for pay-for-delay

17 June 2013 A majority of the US Supreme Court has ruled that the US Federal Trade Commission should be able to challenge so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ patent litigation settlements on antitrust grounds.

AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy win ‘pay-for-delay’ case

8 December 2014 A US court has spared drug companies AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Laboratories a potentially hefty fine after ruling that a ‘pay-for-delay’ deal between them did not violate antitrust grounds.

More on this story

US Supreme Court backs ‘rule-of-reason’ for pay-for-delay

17 June 2013 A majority of the US Supreme Court has ruled that the US Federal Trade Commission should be able to challenge so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ patent litigation settlements on antitrust grounds.

AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy win ‘pay-for-delay’ case

8 December 2014 A US court has spared drug companies AstraZeneca and Ranbaxy Laboratories a potentially hefty fine after ruling that a ‘pay-for-delay’ deal between them did not violate antitrust grounds.

More features

Chinese biotech takes out US rival’s nucleic acid patent at PTAB

Lewis Roca promotes tech expert to managing partner

Panitch Schwarze brings in molecular biologist

US targets ‘product hopping’ with biologic litigation curbs

UPC confirms validity of Edwards Lifesciences heart valve tech patent

ITC concludes row over biotech lab equipment between US and German rivals

UKIPO launches ‘revolutionary’ patent filing and AI tool

USPTO clarifies AI's role in patent eligibility