shutterstock-61613566-vittorio-bruno
Vittorio Bruno / shutterstock.com
12 October 2016AmericasSandra Kuzmich and Russell Garman

Life Technologies v Promega: the long tentacles of infringement

After hearing three patent cases in its last term, the US Supreme Court agreed in June to take on another: Life Technologies et al v Promega et al. The Supreme Court’s focus will be on the meaning of a particular phrase—“substantial portion”—that appears in 35 USC §271(f)(1). This section of the patent statute governs infringement in circumstances where components from the US are shipped abroad for inclusion in a combination that would have infringed a patent had the combination been manufactured in the US.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
17 June 2026   A cancer diagnostics company has lost its bid to overturn a jury verdict in a major patent dispute that has also spawned parallel proceedings before the Federal Circuit and PTAB.
Americas
15 June 2026   Unanimous jury finds willful infringement, with the possibility of a trebled award and a much larger feud still to come.
Americas
12 June 2026   In a strong response to BioNTech, Moderna argues its next-gen vaccine is built on a fundamentally different design from the German biotech’s—setting up a scrap over whether a key patent should have been granted.