shutterstock-61613566-vittorio-bruno
Vittorio Bruno / shutterstock.com
12 October 2016AmericasSandra Kuzmich and Russell Garman

Life Technologies v Promega: the long tentacles of infringement

After hearing three patent cases in its last term, the US Supreme Court agreed in June to take on another: Life Technologies et al v Promega et al. The Supreme Court’s focus will be on the meaning of a particular phrase—“substantial portion”—that appears in 35 USC §271(f)(1). This section of the patent statute governs infringement in circumstances where components from the US are shipped abroad for inclusion in a combination that would have infringed a patent had the combination been manufactured in the US.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
12 January 2026   After “seismic” changes imposed by the USPTO last year, litigating patents will become significantly more difficult and costly to defend, and both plaintiffs and defendants must urgently retool their strategies, advise lawyers from BCLP.
Americas
9 January 2026   A busy week in US courts saw major pharma companies and biotech firms move to protect key therapies and research tools, with new lawsuits over migraine and cancer drug generics, and alleged misuse of COVID-19 vaccine tech.
Americas
8 January 2026   Important questions about when companies must act on suspicions of theft and whether damages can stack with injunctions were raised in a dispute that has already sent ripples across med tech.