29 August 2024FeaturesAmericasKristen Lovin & Niall Frizzell of Keker, Van Nest & Peters

Litigation implications of the USPTO’s terminal disclaimer proposal

If adopted, the pending rule would reshape litigation strategy and offer patent defendants a valuable tool, say Kristen Lovin and Niall Frizzell of Keker, Van Nest & Peters

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@lifesciencesipreview.com

More on this story

Americas

Pfizer’s US Paxlovid patent fight turns on a single error

25 June 2026 The Federal Circuit has brought Paxloid’s infringement case to an end, serving as a reminder that even minor changes to patent language can have major consequences.

Americas

Court upholds $83m sequencing verdict and sets royalty rate

17 June 2026 A cancer diagnostics company has lost its bid to overturn a jury verdict in a major patent dispute that has also spawned parallel proceedings before the Federal Circuit and PTAB.

Americas

Amgen and subsidiary dealt $20m blow over rodent antibody tech

15 June 2026 Unanimous jury finds willful infringement, with the possibility of a trebled award and a much larger feud still to come.