'Cellect': why patent term adjustment is ripe for review

Following the Federal Circuit decision on In re Cellect—a dispute centred on Cellect’s allegations against Samsung Electronics for patent infringement—I wrote about why this outcome cannot be ignored.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@lifesciencesipreview.com

More on this story

Americas

Court upholds $83m sequencing verdict and sets royalty rate

17 June 2026 A cancer diagnostics company has lost its bid to overturn a jury verdict in a major patent dispute that has also spawned parallel proceedings before the Federal Circuit and PTAB.

Americas

Amgen and subsidiary dealt $20m blow over rodent antibody tech

15 June 2026 Unanimous jury finds willful infringement, with the possibility of a trebled award and a much larger feud still to come.

Americas

Moderna: BioNTech is claiming work ‘it never did’

12 June 2026 In a strong response to BioNTech, Moderna argues its next-gen vaccine is built on a fundamentally different design from the German biotech’s—setting up a scrap over whether a key patent should have been granted.