Patent eligibility in Australia: the winding road ahead
In the highly anticipated decision in D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics, handed down earlier this month, the High Court of Australia has unanimously held that isolated naturally occurring DNA is not eligible for patent protection. This decision overturned two earlier Federal Court decisions (Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics 2013 and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics 2014) which had unanimously upheld the patent eligibility of isolated DNA, specifically the isolated BRCA DNA which was the subject of Myriad’s Australian patent number 686004.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
5 February 2026 The British-Swedish pharma giant pays $1.2 billion upfront for access to next-generation weight-loss treatment as China patent cliff changes the market.
20 January 2026 Magic Circle and major US firm among dealmakers who worked on the licensing agreement for a bispecific antibody candidate, marking another significant outbound licensing deal from China’s biopharma sector.
6 January 2026 Danish pharma giant notches an important victory in a huge market for semaglutide, but faces a patent cliff and mounting challenges across India, Canada and the US.