filedimage-shutterstock-com-watermark--1
FiledIMAGE / Shutterstock.com
22 October 2015AsiaTania Obranovich

Patent eligibility in Australia: the winding road ahead

In the highly anticipated decision in D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics, handed down earlier this month, the High Court of Australia has unanimously held that isolated naturally occurring DNA is not eligible for patent protection. This decision overturned two earlier Federal Court decisions (Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics 2013 and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics 2014) which had unanimously upheld the patent eligibility of isolated DNA, specifically the isolated BRCA DNA which was the subject of Myriad’s Australian patent number 686004.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Asia
22 June 2026   The court granted Blue Cross Laboratories a permanent injunction after finding that a rival product’s mark and packaging closely mirrored its own.
Asia
27 May 2026   China’s IP system is undergoing real change. Takeda’s IP head for the region explains what that looks like on the ground and why the old playbook no longer cuts it.
Asia
24 May 2026   The regulatory and IP environment in China is shifting at a rapid pace, bringing new measures, guiding cases, and compliance hurdles. This session provides a high-level overview of the past year’s critical changes and what life sciences companies must anticipate on the horizon.