filedimage-shutterstock-com-watermark--1
FiledIMAGE / Shutterstock.com
22 October 2015AsiaTania Obranovich

Patent eligibility in Australia: the winding road ahead

In the highly anticipated decision in D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics, handed down earlier this month, the High Court of Australia has unanimously held that isolated naturally occurring DNA is not eligible for patent protection. This decision overturned two earlier Federal Court decisions (Cancer Voices Australia v Myriad Genetics 2013 and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics 2014) which had unanimously upheld the patent eligibility of isolated DNA, specifically the isolated BRCA DNA which was the subject of Myriad’s Australian patent number 686004.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Asia
6 January 2026   Danish pharma giant notches an important victory in a huge market for semaglutide, but faces a patent cliff and mounting challenges across India, Canada and the US.
Asia
9 December 2025   The Danish pharma giant is expanding its patent defence in India as multiple generics prepare to challenge its blockbuster diabetes and weight-loss drug ahead of 2026 patent expiry.
Asia
4 December 2025   The Delhi High Court has denied an injunction against an Indian generic manufacturer, finding credible challenges to the validity of Novo's semaglutide patent—flagging concerns over obviousness, double patenting, and evergreening.