Questions on Neurim scope remain post-SPC ruling, say lawyers
The Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) recent refusal to provide further guidance on the full scope of Neurim in a case involving supplementary protection certificates (SPC) last week has left some big questions unanswered.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
8 December 2020 Neurim Pharmaceuticals has won its case against generics drug maker Mylan at the English High Court, which held that its patent for a treatment for insomnia was valid and had been infringed in a ruling handed down on December 4.
22 March 2019 The Court of Justice of the European Union yesterday, March 21, handed down a supplementary protection certificate decision referred to it by the English High Court.