Plant patentability: The scope of exclusion provisions
In March 2015 the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) issued the second decisions in the so-called Broccoli and Tomato cases (G2/13 and G2/12). The two decisions are largely identical and clarify that the EPO can continue to grant patents containing product claims directed to plants and plant material other than a plant variety.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
3 September 2026 Turnaround for 10x after Federal Circuit setback as Delaware jury finds Qiagen-owned Parse infringed three patents covering single-cell sequencing technology.
1 September 2026 Judges dismissed an appeal from MSN Laboratories, which was hoping to show that several patents covering Cabometyx were invalid and would not be infringed by its generic product.