istock-140254616_chrisclode
chrisclode/ iStockphoto.com
30 June 2017Europe

Enhanced damages: takeaways post-Halo

On June 13, 2016, the US Supreme Court held in Halo Electronics v Pulse Electronics that the two-part test in In re Seagate Technology, which was used to determine wilful patent infringement and enhanced damages, was “unduly rigid” and not consistent with section 284 of the Patent Act.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Europe
9 July 2026   China-headquartered Angelalign failed to convince UPC appellate judges to overturn a ban that affects its ability to offer orthodontic planning software in Europe with certain functionality.
Europe
8 July 2026   UPC judges revoke a patent asserted against the companies over their Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine, in a ruling that clarified the court’s key principles on exclusive licences, novelty and inventive step.
Europe
6 July 2026   The Unified Patent Court delivers a mixed ruling in a dispute over liquid biopsy technology, overturning a finding that a patent was likely invalid while refusing to grant interim relief because of the patent owner’s delay.