David Gindler of Orrick discusses the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Amgen v Sanofi and what it means for ongoing Section 112 litigation. The session considers how the decision has been applied—and how it may continue to be applied—by the Federal Circuit, district courts, and the PTAB, with a focus on its relevance to the life sciences sector.
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@lifesciencesipreview.com
2 July 2026 A federal court has ruled in a dispute between a clinical trial technology company and a psychedelic drug developer over allegations of trade secret misuse during a bidding process.
30 June 2026 Sandoz has filed FDA applications for generic versions of Eli Lilly’s blockbuster drugs, marking an early step towards potential competition in the fast-growing GLP-1 market.
25 June 2026 The Federal Circuit has brought Paxlovid’s infringement case to an end, serving as a reminder that even minor changes to patent language can have major consequences.