UK Supreme Court issues Warner-Lambert v Actavis ruling
14-11-2018
Warner-Lambert v Actavis: a summary from the UK Supreme Court hearing
21-02-2018
Dmitrii_Guzhanin / iStockphoto.com
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis is disappointing for pharmaceutical innovators, and enforcing second medical use patents may now be more challenging, lawyers have told LSIPR.
To continue reading this article and to access our full archive, digital magazines and special reports you will need a subscription.
Start a subscription today to access the LSIPR website
If you have already subscribed please login.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription we can add you into, please email Atif at achoudhury@newtonmedia.co.uk
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
For access to the complete website and archive choose '12 MONTH SUBSCRIPTION'. For a free, two-week trial select ‘TWO WEEK FREE TRIAL’.
Warner-Lambert, Pfizer, Actavis, Mylan, UK Supreme Court, pregabalin, Lyrica, second medical use patent, plausibility, sufficiency, pain treatment, patent
