dmitrii-guzhanin-istockphoto-com-scales--1

Dmitrii_Guzhanin / iStockphoto.com

15 November 2018Big Pharma

Warner-Lambert v Actavis ‘disappointing’ for innovators: lawyers

The UK Supreme Court’s decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis is disappointing for pharmaceutical innovators, and enforcing second medical use patents may now be more challenging, lawyers have told LSIPR.

Already registered?

Login to your account

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

UK Supreme Court issues Warner-Lambert v Actavis ruling

14 November 2018 The UK Supreme Court today dismissed Warner-Lambert’s appeal in its pregabalin patent dispute with Actavis, while clarifying the role of plausibility in the sufficiency of patent applications.

Warner-Lambert v Actavis: a summary from the UK Supreme Court hearing

21 February 2018 Infringement and plausibility were the biggest issues on the battleground in the UK Supreme Court’s hearing in a case dealing with second medical use patents, as Claire Phipps-Jones, Katie Cambrook and Rachel Mumby of Bristows report.

More on this story

UK Supreme Court issues Warner-Lambert v Actavis ruling

14 November 2018 The UK Supreme Court today dismissed Warner-Lambert’s appeal in its pregabalin patent dispute with Actavis, while clarifying the role of plausibility in the sufficiency of patent applications.

Warner-Lambert v Actavis: a summary from the UK Supreme Court hearing

21 February 2018 Infringement and plausibility were the biggest issues on the battleground in the UK Supreme Court’s hearing in a case dealing with second medical use patents, as Claire Phipps-Jones, Katie Cambrook and Rachel Mumby of Bristows report.

More on this story

UK Supreme Court issues Warner-Lambert v Actavis ruling

14 November 2018 The UK Supreme Court today dismissed Warner-Lambert’s appeal in its pregabalin patent dispute with Actavis, while clarifying the role of plausibility in the sufficiency of patent applications.

Warner-Lambert v Actavis: a summary from the UK Supreme Court hearing

21 February 2018 Infringement and plausibility were the biggest issues on the battleground in the UK Supreme Court’s hearing in a case dealing with second medical use patents, as Claire Phipps-Jones, Katie Cambrook and Rachel Mumby of Bristows report.

More features

Chinese biotech takes out US rival’s nucleic acid patent at PTAB

Lewis Roca promotes tech expert to managing partner

Panitch Schwarze brings in molecular biologist

US targets ‘product hopping’ with biologic litigation curbs

UPC confirms validity of Edwards Lifesciences heart valve tech patent

ITC concludes row over biotech lab equipment between US and German rivals

UKIPO launches ‘revolutionary’ patent filing and AI tool

USPTO clarifies AI's role in patent eligibility