boule-shutterstock-com-cherry-
Boule / Shutterstock.com
24 March 2016PharmaJoachim Wachenfeld and Oswin Ridderbusch

A second bite at the cherry

Second medical use claims have a long-standing history in European Patent Office (EPO) case law. As is well known, the first ever decision of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal confirmed the patentability of second medical use claims when written in the so-called Swiss-type format. The Enlarged Board in that 1984 decision, G5/83, held that protection was available for “specified new and inventive therapeutic application[s]”. In the years that followed the technical boards of appeal controversially discussed what exactly was meant by the “specified therapeutic applications” referred to by the Enlarged Board.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Pharma
17 September 2026   Bauer Research Foundation has alleged that the CDMO misappropriated its confidential manufacturing know-how related to NO-Cbl, an anticancer drug candidate in the pre-clinical/translational stage of development for potential human use.
Pharma
16 September 2026   A medicine reaching the end of its primary patent term does not necessarily mean the market is open to generics. The complex patent landscape surrounding semaglutide shows how secondary patents covering indications, formulations and manufacturing processes can extend competitive barriers—and why careful freedom-to-operate analysis is critical before launch, says Ana Neves of Inventa.
Pharma
10 September 2026   Four patents stood firm in a Johnson & Johnson unit’s fight with Sandoz, leaving the generics maker facing a lengthy wait before its esketamine nasal spray can reach the US market.