interiminjunctions137495609
Stokkete / Shutterstock.com
1 August 2014PharmaJan Lindberg

Interim injunctions and litigation strategy after Ranbaxy v Pfizer

The District Court of Helsinki gave an interesting and rare decision this year regarding damages for unnecessary interim injunctions in a case between Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy UK Limited and Ranbaxy Pharma AB (Ranbaxy) as plaintiffs and Warner-Lambert Company LLC and Pfizer Oy (Pfizer) as defendants (Decision of the District Court of Helsinki L 10/6838, June 4, 2014). Ranbaxy is the producer of, inter alia, a medicine competing with another named Lipitor, which is produced by one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world, Pfizer.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Pharma
9 July 2026   Separate lawsuits target Indian and Taiwanese pharma companies as Exelixis seeks to keep rival cabozantinib products off the US market until key patents expire.
Pharma
7 July 2026   Leading women from the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors are among the more than 100 professionals recognised in a newly released Influential Women in IP 2026 list, which celebrates leadership, expertise and innovation.
Pharma
1 July 2026   Otsuka v Sun Pharma could redefine which pharmaceutical patents qualify for patent term extensions, with major implications for innovator companies, generic manufacturers and the future of market exclusivity in the country.