interiminjunctions137495609
Stokkete / Shutterstock.com
1 August 2014PharmaJan Lindberg

Interim injunctions and litigation strategy after Ranbaxy v Pfizer

The District Court of Helsinki gave an interesting and rare decision this year regarding damages for unnecessary interim injunctions in a case between Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Ranbaxy UK Limited and Ranbaxy Pharma AB (Ranbaxy) as plaintiffs and Warner-Lambert Company LLC and Pfizer Oy (Pfizer) as defendants (Decision of the District Court of Helsinki L 10/6838, June 4, 2014). Ranbaxy is the producer of, inter alia, a medicine competing with another named Lipitor, which is produced by one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world, Pfizer.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Pharma
31 July 2026   A director review has overturned a PTAB ruling, questioning why it diverged from an ITC decision based on the same patent claims, prior art and evidence.
Pharma
23 July 2026   Canada has firmly slammed the door on patenting methods of medical treatment—but the battle over what counts as a "medical method" is only just beginning. Scott MacKendrick of ROBIC examines a landmark decision that leaves the door ajar for future litigation over complex drug-dosing regimens.
Pharma
9 July 2026   Separate lawsuits target Indian and Taiwanese pharma companies as Exelixis seeks to keep rival cabozantinib products off the US market until key patents expire.