shutterstock_2176439439_velishchuk_yevhen
Velishchuk Yevhen / Shutterstock.com
12 September 2023FeaturesPharmaJeffrey Lewis and Stuart Knight

Is there a step between ‘inventive’ and ‘nonobviousness’?

US law requires a patented invention be nonobvious, ie, a patent may not be obtained “if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious … to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains.” 35 U.S.C. 103.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Week Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@lifesciencesipreview.com 


More on this story

Pharma
9 July 2026   Separate lawsuits target Indian and Taiwanese pharma companies as Exelixis seeks to keep rival cabozantinib products off the US market until key patents expire.
Pharma
7 July 2026   Leading women from the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors are among the more than 100 professionals recognised in a newly released Influential Women in IP 2026 list, which celebrates leadership, expertise and innovation.
Pharma
1 July 2026   Otsuka v Sun Pharma could redefine which pharmaceutical patents qualify for patent term extensions, with major implications for innovator companies, generic manufacturers and the future of market exclusivity in the country.