sergey-nivens-shutterstock-com
Sergey Nivens / Shutterstock.com
20 August 2015AmericasMark Biernacki and Cameron Weir

From profits to damages: Canada’s NIA defence

On July 23, 2015, in Apotex v Merck & Co, Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal found for the first time that the availability to an infringer of a non-infringing alternative (NIA) is a relevant consideration when calculating damages for patent infringement. This is a significant legal development.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Americas
10 February 2026   Telehealth platform faces legal action from the Danish pharma giant, as well as FDA pressure over GLP-1 drugs and a drop in shares after discontinuing new product.
Americas
9 February 2026   The Swiss pharma giant moves to protect patents on its billion-dollar cancer therapy following an ANDA filing by a Canadian generics manufacturer.
Americas
6 February 2026   A Delhi High Court ruling signals more bad news for the Danish pharma giant in the same week that it lost nearly $50 billion in value.